Evil Geniuses Triumph in Legal Battle Against SumaiL

Following an extensive legal battle that spanned over two years, a jury has ruled in favour of Evil Geniuses (EG) over their former player, Sumail “SumaiL” Hassan, on all counts. The verdict comes after SumaiL filed a complaint alleging that EG breached their contract by converting his preferred stock units into common stock without his full comprehension.

The dispute revolved around stock shares granted to SumaiL during his tenure with Evil Geniuses. In 2016, EG awarded him 400,000 shares to retain his services. However, when EG was acquired by Peak6 Strategic Capital in 2019, SumaiL’s stock underwent conversion without his consent, turning into common stock and restricted common stock.

According to reports by Richard Lewis, the lawsuit argued that SumaiL’s stock conversion lacked proper explanation from Peak6 members, claiming he was unaware of the implications. Additionally, the suit contended that subsequent contract amendments imposed unfair financial terms on SumaiL, including a significant salary reduction and restrictions on representing other teams.

Also Read: Which Company Provides the Best iGaming Software?

Evil Geniuses staunchly denied all allegations, asserting that SumaiL was provided with clear contract terms and encouraged to seek legal advice at each negotiation stage. They argued that their actions were not malicious, highlighting the generous financial terms offered to SumaiL, including a $20,000 monthly salary and bonuses.

However, after a 5th-6th place finish at The International 2019, SumaiL signed an amendment to his contract to play for other teams. This amendment altered his contract, reducing his monthly salary to $2,000 and imposing restrictions on tournament participation. SumaiL was offered a mutual release clause in 2019, freeing him from contractual obligations.

Also Read: Top Pokémon Games to Play on PC: Emulators and Off-Brand Alternatives

SumaiL’s legal team contended that the amendment had irregularities and imposed unwarranted obligations, alleging that EG sought to coerce SumaiL into forfeiting his stocks. The lawsuit claimed that EG did not provide complete and accurate information during the purchase agreement, accusing the organization of taking advantage of SumaiL’s commitment and dedication.

The trial involved both parties presenting their arguments before a jury, addressing claims of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and other allegations. The jury’s verdict on March 1st favoured Evil Geniuses and Peak6 on all counts, resulting in no damages awarded to SumaiL.