Finland is on the edge of a complete overhaul of its gambling laws, however, the proposed gambling reforms are stirring up significant concerns about public health and safety. The Social Affairs and Health Committee has issued a warning against opening up the gambling market to competition. They argued that the competition could actually increase gambling-related harm despite the government’s best intentions to bring more activity under legal supervision.
Market Liberalisation Under Scrutiny
The government’s plan, which was outlined in Proposal 16/2025, aims to replace the long-standing monopoly of Veikkaus with a license-based system by 2026. Lawmakers argue that the monopoly is outdated, as most of the gambling activities have shifted online and are beyond national control. This calls for gambling reforms in hopes that a regulated and competitive market will allow better oversight and reduce illegal gambling.
However, the Social Affairs and Health Committee’s recent review highlights concerns that the gambling reforms in the draft do not include strong enough safeguards to protect vulnerable players. The proposal itself introduces important measures, such as mandatory ID checks, payment limits, and gambling blocks. Although many experts believe these steps are not enough.
Calls For Tighter Gambling Reforms
The committee emphasised that gambling is not an ordinary consumer product, and it can lead to addiction and cause harm that extends to families and communities. Lawmakers demand stricter rules and robust enforcement, with greater resource management to monitor the market.
One notable suggestion is to raise the minimum gambling age to 20. This move aims to protect young people from the risks of gambling and also stresses the need for adequate funding.
The committee’s opinion is not unanimous. These views are from the Social Democrats, Greens, Left Alliance, and Centre Party, which highlight the disagreements over various aspects of the gambling reforms.
As Finland moves closer to liberalising its gambling market, the debate showcases the need for careful regulation and strong protections for players.
Also Read: Play Chicago Poker: Rules And Winning Hands
